Governments are usually only good at a few things, anyway. And as they age, they seldom get better at the things they’ve never been good at.
Get the latest from Murray Mandryk straight to your inbox
Published Jan 06, 2025 • Last updated 2 hours ago • 3 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Regardless of who is running the Saskatchewan legislature, there’s always ample reason to protest because governments don’t usually get better at what they haven’t been good at.Photo by KAYLE NEIS /Regina Leader-Post
Article content
Most of us get better with age and experience … or so we convince ourselves.
Generally, though, it’s how things work in the real world. You gain more experience and knowledge toiling at the same trade, craft or profession. You get better at it.
But how things work in the real world can be far removed from how things work in politics and governance — which, in fairness, tends to be more complex and diverse than what most of us do.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
This helps explain the old true truism that aging governments — like this Saskatchewan Party administration — aren’t particularly inclined to get better.
Such thoughts come to mind after Premier Scott Moe’s year-end interview, in which he made the presumably well-intended observation that the 2024 election results told his Saskatchewan Party government it needs to improve in some areas.
Two messages were sent on election night. One is that “we were elected for a fifth term,” Moe told the Leader-Post’s Alec Salloum. “And two is … we need to alter … some of the course that we have and focus more specifically on what, you know, matters to Saskatchewan people.”
This is why the first order of business for the Sask. Party government in the fall sitting was, according to Moe, to “deliver on our platform, and we did that through introducing the Saskatchewan Affordability Act as well as the carbon tax fairness.”
The problem is that this is just refocussing on what this government already does. And it’s not exactly a great New Year’s resolution, to tackle what you really need to improve upon — in this case, the delivery of health care and education and addressing increasingly complex social issues.
Headline News
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Headline News will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Admittedly, what Moe is offering is considerably better than what we saw during the October election campaign — the politicalization of delicate social issues by declaring halfway through the campaign that monitoring change rooms in schools was the No. 1 priority.
One thing governments do get better at is politics. As Moe said in his year-end interview, “Did people vote for a certain party or against a certain party on some statements that were made during the campaign? Sure. Probably both ways.”
Such political cynicism is another reasons aging governments don’t get better. Their focus is on winning, rather than solving issues.
But there is another factor in play: Governments are usually only good at a few things, anyway. And as they age, they seldom get better at the things they’ve never been good at.
To better understand, let’s go back to the previous NDP government of Roy Romanow, which was very good at balancing the books, but very bad at other things … like creating economic growth.
After balancing the books because the previous Progressive Conservative government seemed the exception to the rule in that it was bad at most everything, the NDP’s age-old problem of not being able to grow the population or the economy was exposed.
Advertisement 4
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
It invested badly in failed dot-com and agricultural white elephants, like Spudco and the Broe deal. That it all aged poorly was hardly surprising. After 16 years, the government caucus had virtually no one with a business background. It didn’t even have an active farmer to serve as agriculture minister. (Really, it was the mirror image of today’s Sask. Party caucus.)
Along comes Brad Wall with plenty of agricultural and business experience, and an economic boom that afforded it the fun opportunity of addressing economic matters that the NDP did not have the wherewithal to address.
Unfortunately, it wasn’t blessed with many people who were familiar with the complex delivery of health and education administration.
So by the time Moe inherited government, the fun stuff was done. What’s left are problems the Sask. Party hasn’t been good at solving. Worse, after one term he has lost his most savvy, experienced cabinet minsters from more diverse backgrounds.
That’s another reason governments seldom age well.
Mandryk is a political columnist for the Regina Leader-Post and the Saskatoon StarPhoenix.
Recommended from Editorial
skatchewan Message received? Premier Scott Moe reflects on election year, discusses new priorities for 2025
Premier Moe doubles down on wide support for pronoun policy change
Our websites are your destination for up-to-the-minute Saskatchewan news, so make sure to bookmark thestarphoenix.com and leaderpost.com. For Regina Leader-Post newsletters click here; for Saskatoon StarPhoenix newsletters click here